A review on water-saving agriculture in Europe

This paper aims to analyze the research on the current situation of water-saving agriculture development in Europe. Water-saving agriculture in Europe started early, governments and farmers in various countries have a strong awareness of water-saving in agriculture and have achieved certain results. Due to the global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, the lack of up-to-date field research, the complexity of various agricultural disciplines and categories, and the lack of information sharing, the current cognition of recent progress in the development of water-saving agriculture in Europe is not comprehensive enough. This paper selects four representative European countries: Spain, Germany, Italy, and Denmark as the research objects. Based on the existing research of Chinese and Western scholars, this paper analyzes and studies the current situation of water-saving agriculture in Europe. It has far-reaching significance for other countries in the world to have further development in water-saving agriculture and to protect water resources.

Changes in Kawasaki disease incidence and phenotype during the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION. The aetiology of Kawasaki disease (KD) remains unknown. Changes in infectious exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic owing to infection prevention measures may have affected the incidence of KD, supporting the pathogenic role of an infectious trigger. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, phenotype and outcome of KD before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark. METHODS. This was a retrospective cohort study based on patients diagnosed with KD at a Danish paediatric tertiary referral centre from 1 January 2008 to 1 September 2021. RESULTS. A total of 74 patients met the KD criteria of whom ten were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark. Alof these patients were negative for SARS-CoV-2 DNA and antibodies. A high KD incidence was observed during the first six months of the pandemic, but no patients were diagnosed during the following 12 months. Clinical KD criteria were equally met in both groups. The fraction of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) non-responders was higher in the pandemic group (60%) than in the in the pre-pandemic group (28.3%), although the rate of timely administered IVIG treatment was the same in both groups (>= 80%). Coronary artery dilation was observed in 21.9% in the pre-pandemic group compared with 0% in KD patients diagnosed during the pandemic. CONCLUSION. Changes in KD incidence and phenotype were seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients diagnosed with KD during the pandemic had complete KD, higher liver transaminases and significant IVIG resistance but no coronary artery involvement.Copyright © 2023, Almindelige Danske Laegeforening. All rights reserved.

Emotional risk work during the pandemic: Healthcare professionals' perceptions from a COVID-19 ward

In March 2020, COVID-19 wards were established in hospitals in Denmark. Healthcare professionals from a variety of specialities and wards were transferred to these new wards to care for patients admitted with severe COVID-19 infections. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in a COVID-19 ward at a hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark, including focus group interviews with nursing staff, we intended to explore practices in a COVID-19 ward by seeking insight into the relation between the work carried out and the professionals' ways of talking about it. We used a performative approach of studying how the institutional ways of handling pandemic risk work comes into being and relates to the health professionals' emerging responses. The empirical analysis pointed at emotional responses by the nursing staff providing COVID-19 care as central. To explore these emotional responses we draw on the work of Mary Douglas and Deborah Lupton's concept of the ‘emotion-risk-assemblage'. Our analysis provides insight into how emotions are contextually produced and linked to institutional risk understandings. We show that work in the COVID-19 ward was based on an institutional order that was disrupted during the pandemic, producing significant emotions of insecurity. Although these emotions are structurally produced, they are simultaneously internalised as feelings of incompetence and shame.

Playful Learning During the Reopening of Danish Schools After Covid 19 Closures

This article is based on qualitative and quantitative data collected from teachers and pupils in Danish schools in June 2020, as schools reopened following closures in the spring due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It investigates the transformations in school life that took place in this period in response to strict official guidelines to prevent the spread of infection, transformations both in school learning environments and in teaching activities. Using factor and cluster analyses and logistic regression, it explores the relation between teaching environment and pupils' emotional, social, and academic wellbeing, identifying correlations between key factors in the environment and the three dimensions of wellbeing. The study contributes both to understanding and dealing with the crisis in which education systems in the Nordic countries have found themselves in and adds relevant knowledge on themes of importance for education in the future.

Imagining Life Beyond a Crisis: A Four Quadrant Model to Conceptualize Possible Futures

In this article we report evidence from a series of semi-structured interviews with a broad sample of people living in Denmark (n = 21), about their perspectives on the future during the first months of the global Covid-19 pandemic. The thematic and discursive analyses, based on an abductive ontology, illustrate imaginings of the future along two vectors: individual to collective and descriptive to moral. On a descriptive and individual level, people imagined getting through the pandemic on a myopic day-by-day basis;on a descriptive and collective level, people imagined changes to work and socializing. Their future was bound and curtailed by their immediate present. On a moral and individual level, respondents were less detailed in their reports, but some vowed to change their behaviors. On a moral and collective level, respondents reported what the world should be like and discussed changes to environmental behaviors such as traveling, commuting, and work. The model suggests the domain of individual moral imaginings is the most difficult domain for people to imagine beyond the practicalities of their everyday lives. The implications of this model for comprehending imaginations of the future are discussed. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Culture & Psychology is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

VACCINATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASES, PATIENT KNOWLEDGE AND AWARENESS: RESULTS FROM A NORDIC SURVEY

BackgroundPatients with chronic inflammatory diseases (CID) have an increased risk for contracting infections. For patients with rheumatic diseases EULAR recommends protecting them from vaccine-preventable diseases.ObjectivesTo assess the knowledge and awareness of common vaccinations and extent of immunization among patients with CID in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden (Nordics), and to identify gaps between the existing EULAR vaccination recommendations and current practice as experienced by patients.MethodsA structured anonymous online survey for patients with CID ((rheumatological disease (RD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and dermatological diseases (DD)) was conducted in 2022.The survey was answered by 1748 respondents (1031 patients with RD, 543 with IBD and 563 with DD).ResultsAmong respondents, 89% were female and 58% had disease duration of above 10 years. In total, 56% were treated in specialised and 32% in primary care. Majority had ongoing systemic immunosuppressive treatment (IT) (65%). Majority of RD (59%) and IBD (66%) patients were treated in specialised care whereas minority of DD patients (38%) were treated in specialised care.Forty-nine percent (49%) responded that their healthcare professional (HCP) did not inform them about the increased risk of infection – however, 55% of the respondents believed they are somewhat or much more likely to suffer from infections than those without CID or treatment, 33% thought there is no difference and 13% did not know there is a difference.In total 68% of respondents considered it important to get vaccinated due to CID or IT. The number was particularly high in RD group (74%), although 63% stated they had not received any information regarding vaccinations at the start of their treatment.Commonly recommended vaccinations by the HCP were COVID 19 (66%), influenza (63%) and pneumococcal (45%) vaccination. When comparing respondents ≥65 and <65 years, there was a difference in how often the influenza (71% vs. 57%) and pneumococcal (57% vs. 38%), but not COVID 19 vaccination (68% vs. 65%), were recommended. In addition, 74% and 75% of respondents receiving IT were recommended influenza and COVID 19 vaccination, respectively.In total, 22% had their vaccination status checked before initiating treatment;the lowest percentage was in DD (16%) and the highest in RD (25%). However, 44% of respondents received influenza vaccination before initiation of treatment. Moreover, 62% and 74% of respondents received influenza and COVID 19 vaccination while on treatment, respectively.Eighty-six percent (86%) did not receive a vaccination plan in relation to their CID and treatment. Moreover, 64% of the respondents (RD 57%;DD 71% and IBD 66%) did not have vaccination status assessed on a regular basis. Forty-three percent (43%) were dissatisfied with the follow-up of vaccination status by their HCP. Respondents of age ≥65 years were more satisfied than the younger ones (34% vs. 25% very satisfied) and respondents with RD were more satisfied than those with IBD or DD (33% vs. 25% vs. 20%).Forty-four percent (44%) responded that the information on vaccinations related to their CID and treatment was difficult to find and 71% would like to receive more information.The respondents with RD had different level of awareness regarding EULAR vaccination recommendations. The degree of awareness among patients with RD treated with IT are presented in Figure 1.ConclusionThis Nordic survey provides insights on patients' information needs, information sources and own experiences related to recommendations on vaccinations in relation to their CID and IT. The results confirm a gap between patients' expectations and needs vs. the information they actually receive. Our findings demonstrate a need for increased awareness among patients, providers and HCP regarding EULAR vaccination recommendations in patients with RD.Reference[1]Furer V, et al. 2019 update of EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79: 9–52.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsMeliha C Kapetanovic Grant/research support from: Received independent research grants from Roche and Pfizer, Randeep Mandla Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Current employee of Pfizer Norway, Maria Seddighzadeh Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Current employee of Pfizer Sweden, Susanne Thiesen Gren Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Current employee of Pfizer Denmark, Maaria Palmroth Consultant of: Employee of MedEngine Oy and contractor for Pfizer Oy, Employee of: Contractor for Pfizer Oy, Finland, Dan Henrohn Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Current employee of Pfizer AB, Sweden, Anne Grete Frostrup Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Current employee of Pfizer Denmark, Anna-Maria Hiltunen Consultant of: Pfizer. Employee of Nordic Healthcare Group, Jussi Ranta Consultant of: Pfizer. Employee of Nordic Healthcare Group, Anna-Kaisa Asikainen Consultant of: Pfizer. Employee of Nordic Healthcare Group, Veli-Jukka Anttila Speakers bureau: Lectures for Pfizer, MSD, Astellas, Roche, GSK, BMS, Biogen, Sandoz, Gilead, Unimedic Pharma, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Astra-Zeneca, Consultant of: Consultant for Pfizer and MSD.

Prognostic modelling of number of patients with retinal vein occlusion in anti-VEGF therapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate temporal changes in age- and sex-stratified incidence rates of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) commenced in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment, proportion of patients remaining in active anti-VEGF therapy over time, and to develop a forecasting model for future number of patients with RVO in active anti-VEGF therapy. METHODS: This was a registry-based study of patients with RVO in the Capital Region of Denmark from commenced in anti-VEGF therapy from 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2022. Census data were extracted from Statistics Denmark for incidence rate analyses and forecasting data of future demographics. RESULTS: A total of 2641 patients with RVO were commenced in anti-VEGF therapy, of which 2192 were later discontinued. Number of patients rose dramatically during the first years of introduction of anti-VEGF therapy, after which growth was slower and followed the demographic changes. Trend analyses revealed that the COVID-19 epidemics impacted with fewer referrals and more aggressive discontinuation practices. Annual incidence of RVO in 2012-2021 was 13.1 per 100 000 (95% CI: 12.6-13.6 per 100 000). Proportion of patients with RVO remaining in active anti-VEGF treatment was 55.0%, 40.1%, 30.8% and 12.1% after Years 1, 2, 3 and 8, respectively. According to our forecast, number of patients with RVO in active anti-VEGF therapy will grow slowly but continually at least until year 2035. CONCLUSION: Our study reports incidence rates and provides prognostic modelling of number of patients with RVO in anti-VEGF therapy.

High mortality among patients with severe COVID-19 and Do Not Intubate orders

INTRODUCTION. Moderate to severe respiratory distress among patients with COVID-19 is associated with a high mortality. This study evaluated ventilator support and mortality by Do Intubate (DI) or Do Not Intubate (DNI) orders. METHODS. This was a retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 and a supplemental oxygen requirement of 15 l/min. The patients were divided into two groups corresponding to the first and second wave of COVID-19 and were subsequently further divided according to DI and DNI orders and analysed regarding need of ventilator support and mortality. RESULTS. The study included 178 patients. The mortality was 24% for patients with DI orders (n = 115) and 81% for patients with DNI orders (n = 63) increasing to 98% (n = 46) for patients with DNI orders and very high flow oxygen requirements ( 30 l/min.). From the first to the second wave of COVID-19, the use of constant continuous positive airway pressure (cCPAP) increased from 71% to 91% (p < 0.001), whereas the use of mechanical ventilation decreased from 54% to 28% (odds ratio = 0.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.85)). CONCLUSION. The mortality was high for patients with DNI orders and respiratory distress with very high levels in supplemental oxygen in both the first and second wave of COVID-19 despite an increase in use of cCPAP and treatment with dexamethasone and remdesivir during the second wave. Hence, careful evaluation on transition to palliative care must be considered for these patients.

Findings in Danish long-term care facilities in the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

PURPOSE: To describe the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infections, deaths and outbreaks among residents in Danish long-term care facilities (LTCFs) from February 2020 to February 2021. METHODS: Danish COVID-19 national register data from a newly implemented automated surveillance system was used to describe incidence rate and deaths (per 1000 residents' years), number of tests, SARS-CoV-2 infections and outbreaks among LTCF residents. A case was defined as a LTCF resident with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. An outbreak was defined as two or more cases in one LTCF within a 14-day period, and considered closed if no new cases had occurred within 28 days. Death was defined as occurring within 30-days of a positive test. RESULTS: A total of 55,359 residents living in 948 LTCFs were included. The median age of the residents was 85 years and 63% were female. There was a total of 3712 cases found among residents across 43% of all LTCFs. Nearly all (94%) cases were linked to outbreaks. Higher numbers of cases and outbreaks were seen in Denmark's Capital Region compared to other regions. Overall, 22 SARS-CoV-2 deaths and 359 deaths (non-SARS-CoV-2) per 1000 resident years were identified in the study period. CONCLUSION: Less than half of LTCFs identified any cases. The majority of cases were linked to outbreaks, emphasizing the importance of preventing introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into the facilities. Furthermore, it highlights the need to invest efforts into infrastructures, routine procedures and monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in LTCFs to limit the introduction and the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

Are changes in physical activity during COVID-19 associated with mental health among Danish university students?

Aims: The benefits associated with being physical active on mental health is well-established, but little is known on how rapid changes in physical activity are associated with mental health. This study investigated the association between changes in physical activity and mental health among Danish university students during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Methods: Online survey data were collected among 2,280 university students at the University of Southern Denmark and University of Copenhagen in May-June 2020 as part the "COVID-19 International Student Well-being Study." Multiple linear regressions were used to analyze associations between changes in physical activity and mental health (depression and stress scores) adjusted for potential socio-economic confounders. Results: During the first COVID-19 lockdown, 40% decreased their moderate and 44% their vigorous physical activity, while 16% increased their moderate and 13% their vigorous physical activity. Overall, students with a stable physical activity level had the lowest mean depressive and stress scores. Adjusted analyses showed that a decrease in vigorous and moderate physical activity level was significantly associated with a higher depression score (mean difference (vigorous): 1.36, p < 0.001 and mean difference (moderate): 1.55, p < 0.001). A decrease in vigorous physical activity and an increase in moderate physical activity was associated with a 1-point increase in the PSS-4 stress score (p < 0.001). Conclusion: A substantial proportion of students changed their physical activity level during lockdown. Our findings emphasize the importance of staying physically active during COVID-19 lockdown. This knowledge might be important for relevant health authorities to bridle post-pandemic mental health challenges.

Advancing patient safety governance in the COVID-19 response

In the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring the safety of health care services remains a serious, ongoing challenge. This once-in-a-century global health crisis exposed the vulnerability of healthcare delivery systems and the subsequent risks of patient harm. Given the scale of the occurrence and costs of preventable patient safety events, intervention and investment are still relatively modest. Good patient safety governance focuses on what leaders and policy makers can do to improve system performance and reduce the financial burden of avoidable care. Moreover, it is essential in driving progress in improving safety outcomes. This report examines how patient safety governance mechanisms in OECD countries have withstood the test of COVID-19 and provides recommendations for countries in further improving patient safety governance and strengthening health system resilience.

Improving the timeliness of health expenditure tracking in OECD and low-and middle-income countries

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted that access to timely health spending data is crucial for informed policy-making. This Health Working Paper summarises and compares the methodologies applied in around half of OECD countries to estimate public and private health spending for the most recent year (i.e. t-1) as well as the approaches taken by the OECD Secretariat to fill existing data gaps for the remaining OECD countries. For the first time, the paper also explores the feasibility of nowcasting health spending for the current year (i.e. t) and examines data sources that could be potentially useful in such an exercise. While this review should help OECD countries that do not yet have experience in estimating health spending for year t-1 to improve the timeliness in their data reporting, a special focus in this paper lies on testing the applicability of the methods in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), using the WHO Western Pacific Region (WPRO) as an example. Generally, different data sources exist in many countries that would allow for a more timely estimation for health spending aggregates.

Cooperating for a better future

Este documento aborda lo que considero los principales problemas del mundo, aunque reconozco que también hay otros problemas en la actualidad, como la inflación y la guerra en Ucrania. Intentaré abordar los principales problemas, que son de interés para el CIRIEC, que es una organización internacional que presta especial atención a lo que se denomina el Tercer Sector" o "Economía Social", un área que se sitúa entre el sector empresarial privado y el gobierno a pesar de que no soy, debo admitirlo, un experto en este último campo. Lo trataré en el contexto de la discusión de un par de problemas a los que nos enfrentamos en el mundo y que me parecen realmente importantes. El primer problema es la desigualdad económica, de la que sé algo. El segundo problema es el cambio climático y los problemas medioambientales, que creo que son los más importantes. También me referiré al final a algunos problemas relacionados con la pandemia del COVID. En todos los problemas, lo que podríamos llamar el Tercer Sector puede desempeñar un gran papel.Alternate :This paper addresses what I consider to be the world's main problems, although I recognise that there are also other problems at present, such as inflation and the war in Ukraine. I will try to address the main problems, which are of interest to CIRIEC, which is an international organisation that pays particular attention to what is called the Third Sector" or "Social Economy", an area that lies between the private business sector and the government despite I am not, I must admit, an expert in this last field. I will deal with it in the context of discussing a couple of problems we face in the world that I think are really important. The first problem is economic inequality, which I know something about. The second problem is climate change and environmental problems, which I think are the most important. I will also refer at the end to some problems related to the COVID pandemic. In all the problems, what we could call the Third Sector can play a big role.

Pandemi, krisehåndtering og arbejdsliv

Da Mette Frederiksen lukkede ned for det danske samfund i midten af marts måned 2020 – som respons på den globale coronapandemi – var det en historisk uset grad af intervention på det danske arbejdsmarked, der medførte en næsten øjeblikkelig nedlukning for mange danske arbejdspladser både i det private og det offentlige. Det var på mange måder en usædvanlig beslutning, som fik store konsekvenser på stort set alle samfundsområder. Siden anden Verdenskrig, har der ikke været gennemført så pludselige og omfattende ændringer af arbejdsvilkår og arbejdets organisering med konsekvenser for de sociale relationer på arbejdspladser og for forholdene på arbejdsmarkedet mere generelt, som det skete under coronapandemien. I starten steg arbejdsløsheden voldsomt, og man indførte en række hjælpepakker til både virksomheder og lønmodtagere, som blev hjemsendt, f.eks. den såkaldte lønkompensation som skulle holde hånden under de ansatte i særligt udsatte brancher. Denne tilgang var ikke unik for Danmark. Alternate abstract:When Mette Frederiksen shut down Danish society in mid-March 2020 – in response to the global corona pandemic – it was a historically unprecedented degree of intervention in the Danish labor market, which led to an almost immediate shutdown of many Danish workplaces both in the private and the public sector. It was in many ways an unusual decision, which had major consequences in virtually all areas of society. Since the Second World War, there have not been such sudden and comprehensive changes to working conditions and the organization of work with consequences for social relations at workplaces and for conditions on the labor market more generally, as happened during the corona pandemic. At the start, unemployment rose sharply, and a number of aid packages were introduced for both companies and wage earners, who were sent home, e.g. the so-called wage compensation, which was supposed to hold the hand of the employees in particularly vulnerable industries. This approach was not unique to Denmark.

Lesions in lockdown: mobile dermoscopy in virtual dermatology clinics

Teledermatology is a useful tool in facilitating dermatology outpatient services since the advent of COVID-19. Assessment of lesions has become difficult to facilitate in large numbers. Teledermoscopy has been used for remote lesion assessment. However, the majority of teledermoscopy has been facilitated by healthcare professionals rather than the patient themselves (Vestergaard T, Prasad S, Schuster A et al. Introducing teledermoscopy of possible skin cancers in general practice in Southern Denmark. Fam Pract 2020;37: 513-18). Patients referred with lesions deemed to be low risk are now often initially assessed via telephone consultation in conjunction with photographs of the lesion. The majority of patients are subsequently called for dermoscopy. However, many of those referred have benign lesions and could be safely discharged if dermoscopy images of the lesion were available. Low-cost mobile dermoscopy attachments are available and have been marketed to patients for self-monitoring. We compared a smartphone-compatible dermoscopy device (Dermlite HUD) with traditional dermoscopic photography to assess the feasibility of using this device to photograph skin lesions. This device has equivalent magnification (x 10) to dermatoscopes, a smaller field of view (which in all lesions still allowed complete visualization) and employs polarized light. Dermoscopic photography using the Dermlite HUD was taken of 30 consecutive lesions over a 1-month period by dermatology registrars in the dermatology department. Lesions assessed included pigmented lesions, vascular lesions, nonulcerated skin cancers and benign lesions. Images were assessed by a consultant dermatologist and compared to dermoscopic photographs taken using the standard method employed in the department. Images were compared in terms of resolution, field of view and colour quality between the two instruments as per validated image analysis (Celebi M, Mendonca T, Marques J. Dermoscopy Image Analysis, 1st edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2015). The photographed lesions were assessed by a consultant dermatologist and compared with the standard method. Photos taken with the smartphone attachment were found to be 97% equivalent in terms of resolution, field of view and colour quality to those taken using the standard method and 29 of 30 were deemed suitable for remote lesion assessment. Low-cost smartphone dermatoscope attachments provide images of comparable quality to those taken with a dermatoscope and camera. This offers an opportunity to facilitate fully virtual assessment of low-risk skin lesions and is of use in patients unable to travel to clinics or during lockdowns to facilitate virtual clinics.

Ny arbejdslivsbalancer under corona-krisen – muligheder og udfordringer for ledelse og medarbejdere

Da Danmark lukkede ned i midten af marts 2020, skulle mange arbejdspladser på kort tid omstrukturere deres ledelse og samarbejde. Særligt distanceledelse var for mange ledere og medarbejdere en ny udfordring – og selv på arbejdspladser, hvor man fra tid til anden allerede havde arbejdet med virtuel ledelse og samarbejde, var det nyt at have virtuelle medier som det eneste ledelsesredskab. Når en altomfavnende krise manifesterer sig, bliver kvaliteter såvel som mangler i ledelse særligt tydelige. Corona-krisen har således været en prisme, hvorigennem vi kan betragte ledelse og arbejde i et nyt lys, og dermed også et værktøj, som kan bruges til at revurdere ledelse såvel som vores forståelse af arbejdets natur. Helt overordnet stiller vores erfaringer fra ledelse og arbejdsliv under corona spørgsmålstegn ved den traditionelle organisering af arbejdet, som stadig mange steder er bundet op på fysisk tilstedeværelse på arbejdspladsen. Spørgsmålet er, hvilke nye arbejdslivsbalancer, coronaen har åbnet muligheder for – og om der er faldgruber i de nye muligheder.Alternate abstract:When Denmark shut down in mid-March 2020, many workplaces had to restructure their management and collaboration in a short time. Distance management in particular was for many managers and employees a new challenge – and even in workplaces where from time to time you had already worked with virtual management and collaboration, it was new to have virtual media as the only management tool. When an all-embracing crisis manifests, qualities as well as deficiencies in leadership become particularly evident. The Corona crisis has thus been a prism through which we can view management and work in a new light, and thus also a tool that can be used to reassess management as well as our understanding of the nature of work. Overall, our experiences from management and working life during corona call into question the traditional organization of work, which in many places is still tied to physical presence at the workplace. The question is which new work-life balances the corona has opened up opportunities for - and whether there are pitfalls in the new opportunities.

New (types of) parties and government: the Danish general election 2022

During the Covid-19 crisis, there was a high level of rallying around the flag for the Social Democratic government. However, support waned with the sense of crisis, and some ‘scandals' surfaced. The ‘mink scandal' caused an early election to be called. A high number of parties, 14, competed in the election, and after the election 12 parties are now represented in parliament–a new record number. When comparing the election results of 2019 and 2022, two overall results stand out. First, only one of the two traditional large parties has maintained this status and fragmentation is increased. Second, two new parties made it into the ‘top-5' in 2022, both formed by former prominent Liberals. The election yielded a narrow victory to the red bloc. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen was able to stay in office after the election but exchanged her red bloc parliamentary majority for a coalition government with the Liberals and Moderates. Thus, a new type of coalition has emerged: a majority government spanning the usual two blocs, but challenged by opposition from both the right and left. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Focused lung ultrasound to predict respiratory failure in patients with symptoms of COVID-19. Amulticentre prospective cohort study

Background: In patients with COVID-19, lung ultrasound can assess possible lung involvement. The examination is quick, performed at bedside and has a low risk of virus transmission. The aim of this study was evalute if lung ultrasound can predict the need for mechanical ventilation, admission to an intensive care unit, high-flow oxygen treatment, death of COVID-19. Method(s): A multicenter prospective cohort trial was performed during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark. Film clips from focused lung ultrasound examinations were recorded and rated by blinded observers using different scoring systems. Result(s): A total of 3,889 film clips of 398 patients were analyzed. Patients who died of COVID-19 after receiving intensive care treatment, mechanical ventilation or high-flow oxygen supplement had a significantly higher ultrasound score than those who survived or did not need these treatments. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that lung ultrasound predicts mechanical ventilation (RR 2.44, 95% CI 1.32 - 5.52), admission to intensive care (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.41 - 54.59) and high-flow oxygen treatment (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.5 - 2.53) when adjusting for sex, age and relevant comorbidity. There was no diagnostic difference between a scoring system using only anterolateral thorax zones and a scoring system that also included dorsal zones. Interpretation(s): Focused lung ultrasound in patients with clinical suspicion of COVID-19 predicts respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, admission to intensive care units and high-flow oxygen. Thus, focused lung ultrasound may be used to risk stratify patients with COVID-19 symptom.

Are societies in conflict more susceptible to believe in COVID-19 conspiracy theories? A 66 nation study

Conspiracy theories widely influence our social and political lives. A recent example is the broad impact such theories had on government's efforts to halt the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. In that context, public's compliance and willingness to get vaccinated was found to be substantially and negatively affected by the belief in conspiracy theories, among various factors. In the present study, we tested whether some countries are more susceptible to conspiracy theories than others. We examined, for the first time, the idea that the degree of intensity of conflict predicts the degree of belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories. A multilevel analysis across 66 countries (N = 46,450) demonstrated that people living in countries with higher conflict intensity tended to be more susceptible to COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs. These findings are the first large-scale comparative evidence of the profound psychological effects of conflicts on the involved societies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement The belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories has severe implications on public's health. Thus, it is important to better understand the reasons behind such beliefs. The present study provides new information which helps to better understand the contexts in which conspiracy belief thrive. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)